RFP vs. RFQ: The Definitive Guide
Stop wasting time on the wrong solicitations. Learn the difference immediately.
Sarah Jenkins
Senior Procurement Specialist
Quick Summary
Key Facts
- RFQ evaluates qualifications first; pricing is often omitted.
- RFP evaluates method + price using weighted scoring.
- IFB is lowest responsive bid with minimal negotiation.
Decision Checklist
- Confirm which solicitation type you are responding to.
- Match submission package to evaluation criteria.
- Remove pricing from RFQ responses unless explicitly requested.
Source context: Public procurement scoring norms and contractor bid workflows.
Document Identifier Tool
Answer 3 questions to identify the bid type.
RFQ: Request for Qualifications
An RFQ is often the first step in a two-part selection process (RFQ → RFP), or used for professional services like Architecture/Engineering. The client wants to filter out unqualified contractors before reviewing detailed price proposals.
What they are looking for:
- Resumes: Do your Project Manager and Superintendent have experience with this specific type of facility?
- Past Performance: Have you completed 3 similar projects in the last 5 years?
- Financial Stability: Audited financials showing you can float the cash flow.
- Safety Record (EMR): An EMR > 1.0 is often an automatic disqualifier.
CRITICAL RULE: Do Not Include Pricing unless explicitly asked. Including a dollar figure in an RFQ can sometimes result in immediate disqualification for "anticipatory bidding."
RFP: Request for Proposal
Used for "Best Value" contracts vs "Low Bid." The client has a problem and wants your solution. This is common in Design-Build or CM-at-Risk delivery methods.
You are evaluating on a "Scoring Matrix." Typical weighting might be:
- Price: 40 points
- Technical Approach: 30 points
- Schedule: 20 points
- Interview/Oral Presentation: 10 points
- Technical Approach: Don't just regurgitate the scope. Explain how you will mitigate logistics challenges (e.g., "We will use a tower crane to avoid street closures").
- Winning Strategy: "Ghosting" the competition. Subtly highlight your strengths that you know your competitor lacks (e.g., "Unlike firms without local offices, our self-perform crews are based 5 miles from the site").
IFB: Invitation for Bid
The classic "Hard Bid" or "Low Bid" scenario. The plans are 100% complete (Design-Bid-Build). There is no room for negotiation on scope; you are pricing the drawings exactly as shown.
- Focus: Price, Compliance, Bonding.
- The Danger: The "Race to the Bottom." If you miss a scope item, you eat the cost. There is no change order for things "implied" but not drawn.
- Winning Strategy: Lean operations and aggressive sub-buyouts. You win IFBs by having better coverage from subcontractors than the other GCs.
Quick Comparison Table
| Type | Primary Question | Selection Criteria | Negotiation? |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFQ | "Who are you?" | Experience / Team | Yes (Scope) |
| RFP | "How will you do it?" | Value + Price | Yes (Best & Final) |
| IFB | "How much?" | Price Only | No |