Low Bid vs Best Value Construction Procurement [2025 Comparison]

Introduction

The choice between low bid and best value procurement fundamentally shapes how construction contracts are awarded. Understanding these methods helps contractors develop appropriate strategies for each and compete more effectively in both environments.

This guide compares low bid and best value procurement methods, examining their advantages and disadvantages, when each is appropriate, and how contractors can succeed under each approach.

Quick Comparison

Low Bid: Award to lowest price from responsive, responsible bidder
Best Value: Award based on combination of price and qualifications
Key Difference: How much non-price factors influence selection

Low Bid Procurement

Low bid (also called low-price technically acceptable) awards contracts to the lowest-priced bidder who meets minimum requirements.

How Low Bid Works

Owner issues invitation to bid with complete plans/specs
Contractors submit sealed price bids
Bids opened publicly at specified time
Lowest bid verified for responsiveness and responsibility
Contract awarded to lowest responsive, responsible bidder

Advantages of Low Bid

Transparency: Clear, objective selection criteria
Simplicity: Straightforward evaluation process
Competition: Drives competitive pricing
Speed: Faster evaluation and award
Fairness: All bidders know the rules
Legal Protection: Less susceptible to protests

Disadvantages of Low Bid

Price Focus: Ignores non-price factors
Quality Risk: May select less qualified contractor
Change Orders: Low bidders may seek change orders
Schedule Risk: May result in longer completion
Limited Innovation: Rewards building to minimum spec
Relationship: Adversarial dynamics possible

When Low Bid is Required

Many public entities are legally required to use low bid for construction:

Traditional state and local public works
Federal construction under certain thresholds
Projects where statutes mandate low bid
Well-defined scope with clear specifications

Best Value Procurement

Best value procurement considers both price and non-price factors to select the proposal offering the greatest overall value to the owner.

How Best Value Works

Owner issues RFP with evaluation criteria and weights
Contractors submit price and technical proposals
Evaluation committee scores technical factors
Price evaluated (may be scored or analyzed separately)
Award based on best overall value to owner

Common Evaluation Factors

Price: Often 30-60% of total evaluation
Experience: Similar project history
Key Personnel: Team qualifications
Technical Approach: Project methodology
Schedule: Timeline and milestones
Past Performance: References and ratings
Safety: Safety record and programs
Small Business: Subcontracting plans

Advantages of Best Value

Quality Focus: Considers contractor qualifications
Risk Reduction: Selects capable contractors
Innovation: Rewards better approaches
Relationship: Sets collaborative tone
Outcomes: Often better project results
Flexibility: Can weight factors appropriately

Disadvantages of Best Value

Complexity: More complex evaluation process
Subjectivity: Some factors are subjective
Time: Longer evaluation periods
Cost: More expensive to administer
Protest Risk: More susceptible to challenges
Proposal Cost: Contractors invest more in proposals

When Best Value is Used

Complex projects where qualifications matter
Design-build and CM at Risk delivery
Federal contracts (authorized by FAR)
Private sector projects (no restrictions)
States that have authorized best value for construction

Side-by-Side Comparison

Aspect	Low Bid	Best Value
Selection Basis	Lowest price	Price + qualifications
Evaluation Complexity	Simple	Complex
Transparency	High (price is clear)	Moderate (scoring varies)
Proposal Effort	Lower	Higher
Quality Consideration	Minimum acceptable	Scored factor
Award Timeline	Faster	Slower
Small Contractor Access	Easier (price-only)	Harder (experience valued)
Innovation Potential	Low	Higher

When to Use Each Method

Low Bid Works Best When:

Scope is clearly defined with detailed specifications
Project complexity is low to moderate
Multiple qualified contractors are available
Budget constraints are primary concern
Design is complete before bidding
Legal requirements mandate low bid

Best Value Works Best When:

Project is complex or high-risk
Contractor qualifications significantly impact success
Schedule is critical
Innovation or alternative approaches are desired
Past performance indicates likely future results
Design-build or CM at Risk delivery

Contractor Strategies

Success requires different strategies for each procurement type:

Winning Low Bid Work

Efficiency: Focus on operational efficiency
Accuracy: Develop precise estimating capabilities
Selectivity: Bid projects matching your strengths
Volume: Maintain steady bidding activity
Relationships: Build subcontractor networks for pricing
Compliance: Ensure complete, responsive bids

Winning Best Value Work

Track Record: Build strong performance history
Team: Develop and retain talented staff
Proposals: Invest in proposal quality
Differentiation: Develop unique capabilities
References: Cultivate satisfied clients
Price Balance: Competitive price with strong qualifications

Key Success Factors

Understand evaluation criteria before bidding
Read RFP/IFB requirements carefully
Tailor approach to procurement method
Build capabilities that matter in best value
Maintain competitive pricing for low bid

Industry Trends

The construction industry is evolving in its approach to procurement:

Growing Best Value Adoption

More states authorizing best value for construction
Federal government expanding best value use
Private sector continues to prefer best value
Recognition of total project cost vs lowest bid price

Hybrid Approaches

Prequalification before low bid competition
Two-step processes (qualify, then price)
Adjusted low bid methods
Price with minimum technical thresholds

Owner Considerations

Total cost of ownership vs initial price
Risk allocation and management
Schedule reliability importance
Quality and safety performance

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a higher-priced bid win in best value?

Yes, if qualifications sufficiently outweigh the price difference. The higher-priced proposal must score well enough on non-price factors to overcome the price disadvantage when weighted and combined. This is the essence of best value procurement.

Why do public entities still use low bid?

Many states legally require low bid for construction to ensure transparency and prevent favoritism. Low bid is also simpler to administer and harder to challenge. Some jurisdictions have updated laws to allow best value, but many have not.

Which method is better for contractors?

It depends on your competitive advantages. Efficient, price-competitive contractors may prefer low bid. Those with strong track records, experienced teams, and differentiated capabilities often prefer best value where those qualities are rewarded.

How should I price best value proposals?

Be competitive but not at the expense of quality. Price typically counts for 30-60% of evaluation. You can sometimes win with a higher price if qualifications are strong, but unreasonably high prices will hurt. Find the balance that maximizes your overall score.

Are best value evaluations subjective?

Partially. Evaluation criteria and weights are published, but scoring within categories involves judgment. Well-run procurements use multiple evaluators, clear scoring guidelines, and consensus processes to maintain objectivity.

Conclusion

Both low bid and best value procurement methods have their place in construction. Understanding when each is appropriate and how to compete effectively under each helps contractors develop winning strategies for diverse market conditions.

Key takeaways:

Low bid rewards price competitiveness; best value rewards qualifications
Understand which method is being used before developing strategy
Build capabilities that succeed in both environments
Best value is growing but low bid remains common in public sector
Tailor your approach to each procurement's specific criteria

Find Construction Bid Opportunities

Ready to compete for both low bid and best value projects? ConstructionBids.ai aggregates public and private construction bids with AI-powered matching. Get daily digests of relevant opportunities delivered to your inbox.

Start Finding Bids →