Use value engineering strategies to differentiate your construction bids and win more contracts. Value engineering (VE) is a systematic method of improving project value by examining functions and finding ways to deliver them at lower cost without sacrificing quality, safety, or performance.
What Is Value Engineering in Construction?
Value engineering originated during World War II when material shortages forced engineers to find alternatives that maintained performance. Today, VE is required on all federal construction projects over $2 million and is standard practice on most large commercial and institutional projects. The critical distinction: VE maintains function while reducing cost. Cost-cutting simply removes scope.
The SAVE Methodology
The six-phase SAVE Job Plan provides the structured framework for value engineering:
- Information Phase — Gather project data, identify highest-cost elements
- Function Analysis Phase — Define functions using verb-noun pairs, categorize as basic or secondary
- Creative Phase — Brainstorm alternative ways to achieve each function
- Evaluation Phase — Screen ideas against feasibility, cost, and performance criteria
- Development Phase — Develop shortlisted alternatives into complete proposals
- Presentation Phase — Present proposals with supporting data and cost-benefit analysis
VE During the Bidding Phase
The bidding phase is the most strategic time to propose VE alternatives. Always submit a conforming base bid alongside VE proposals. Use the three-tier approach: no-risk VE (equivalent brands, prefabrication), moderate VE (alternative systems requiring design review), and transformative VE (fundamental approach changes).
Common VE Opportunities by Trade
Structural: Post-tensioned slabs, steel joists replacing wide-flange beams, helical piles, precast panels, optimized rebar spacing.
MEP Systems: VRF systems, LED with integrated controls, PEX piping, prefabricated MEP racks, right-sized equipment.
Finishes: Polished concrete replacing terrazzo, LVT replacing natural stone, fiber cement panels, standard ceiling grids.
Site Work: Bioswales replacing underground detention, pervious pavement, on-site soil balancing, geogrid-reinforced base, native landscaping.
Presenting VE Alternatives in Your Bid
Include: description of original design, proposed alternative with specifications, function comparison with performance data, side-by-side cost comparison, schedule impact, and risk assessment. Professional presentation separates winning VE proposals from those that get dismissed.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Go beyond initial cost savings. Include lifecycle costs over 20-30 years, annual maintenance, energy performance, replacement frequency, schedule acceleration value, and risk-adjusted net present value. Owners evaluate VE on total cost of ownership.
Owner Perspective
Owners value VE proposals because they demonstrate expertise, provide budget flexibility, and reduce project risk. Many contracts include VE sharing clauses (typically 50/50) that incentivize contractor-initiated proposals throughout the project.
FAQ
Common questions covered: VE vs. cost-cutting, when VE is required, identifying VE opportunities, savings sharing models, potential pitfalls, certifications (CVS/AVS), number of proposals to include, and subcontractor VE coordination.