Understanding Unit Price vs Lump Sum Contracts in Construction
The choice between unit price and lump sum contracts significantly affects risk allocation, pricing strategy, and project administration. Understanding these contract types helps contractors bid more effectively and manage projects successfully.
Contract Type Overview
Lump Sum (Fixed Price) Contracts
A single total price for all work described:
- Contractor provides complete scope for fixed price
- Owner knows total cost before construction
- Contractor bears quantity and productivity risk
- Most common for well-defined projects
Unit Price Contracts
Payment based on actual quantities installed:
- Prices established per unit of work
- Final contract amount depends on actual quantities
- Owner bears quantity risk
- Common when quantities are uncertain
Hybrid Contracts
Many projects combine both approaches:
- Lump sum for well-defined work
- Unit prices for variable quantities
- Best of both approaches
- Common in civil and infrastructure
When Each Contract Type is Used
Lump Sum is Appropriate When
Complete Design:
- Drawings and specs are final
- Scope is well-defined
- Limited unknowns expected
- Design changes unlikely
Project Types:
- Commercial buildings
- Residential construction
- Most vertical construction
- Renovation with good surveys
Unit Price is Appropriate When
Uncertain Quantities:
- Earthwork with unknown conditions
- Underground utilities
- Environmental remediation
- Projects with variable scope
Project Types:
- Highway and road construction
- Site development
- Utility installation
- Heavy civil construction
How Lump Sum Contracts Work
Contractor Responsibilities
Under lump sum contracts, you're responsible for:
- Completing all work shown in documents
- Absorbing quantity overruns
- Managing productivity risk
- Delivering within your price
Estimating for Lump Sum
Your estimate must account for:
Direct Costs:
- Accurate quantity takeoff
- Current material pricing
- Realistic labor productivity
- Equipment requirements
Risk Contingency:
- Quantity uncertainty allowance
- Productivity risk factor
- Unknown conditions allowance
- Design clarification risk
Markup:
- Overhead recovery
- Profit margin
- Risk premium
Risk Allocation
| Risk | Lump Sum | |------|----------| | Quantity risk | Contractor | | Productivity risk | Contractor | | Design completeness | Shared | | Unknown conditions | Typically owner | | Material price changes | Contractor | | Schedule risk | Contractor |
Advantages of Lump Sum
For Owners:
- Known total cost
- Simpler administration
- Contractor incentive for efficiency
- Less quantity verification needed
For Contractors:
- Potential for higher profit if efficient
- Simpler billing process
- Less documentation burden
- Rewards accuracy and productivity
Disadvantages of Lump Sum
For Owners:
- Higher contingency in bids
- Disputes over scope
- Change order complexity
- Risk of contractor cutting corners
For Contractors:
- Risk of quantity overruns
- Document interpretation disputes
- Limited flexibility for changes
- Potential for losses if estimate wrong
How Unit Price Contracts Work
Structure of Unit Prices
Unit price bids specify:
| Item | Description | Est. Qty | Unit | Unit Price | Extended | |------|-------------|----------|------|------------|----------| | 1 | Excavation | 5,000 | CY | $12.00 | $60,000 | | 2 | Crushed aggregate | 2,000 | TON | $45.00 | $90,000 | | 3 | Concrete pavement | 8,000 | SY | $55.00 | $440,000 | | 4 | Storm pipe (24") | 1,500 | LF | $85.00 | $127,500 |
Final payment based on actual installed quantities.
Estimating for Unit Prices
Unit prices must include:
Per-Unit Direct Costs:
- Material per unit
- Labor per unit
- Equipment per unit
Allocated Costs:
- Mobilization (often separate item)
- General conditions allocation
- Overhead allocation
- Profit per unit
The Unbalanced Bid Challenge
Contractors sometimes "unbalance" bids:
Front-End Loading:
- Higher prices on early items
- Improves cash flow
- Common but risky
Quantity Gaming:
- Higher prices where quantities may increase
- Lower prices where quantities may decrease
- Requires good estimation of actual quantities
Risks of Unbalancing:
- May be detected and rejected
- Can backfire if quantities differ from expectations
- Damages relationships with owners
- Some owners prohibit mathematically
Risk Allocation
| Risk | Unit Price | |------|------------| | Quantity risk | Owner | | Productivity risk | Contractor | | Unit price risk | Contractor | | Unknown conditions | Shared | | Material price changes | Contractor | | Measurement disputes | Shared |
Advantages of Unit Price
For Owners:
- Pay for actual work
- Flexibility for scope adjustments
- Less contingency needed for quantities
- Fair pricing for variable work
For Contractors:
- Reduced quantity risk
- Payment for actual work
- Flexibility for changed conditions
- Clearer basis for pricing changes
Disadvantages of Unit Price
For Owners:
- Unknown final cost
- More administrative burden
- Must verify quantities
- Potential for disputes
For Contractors:
- More documentation required
- Measurement disputes
- Cash flow timing issues
- Administrative overhead
Bidding Strategies by Contract Type
Lump Sum Strategy
Thorough Takeoff:
- Verify every quantity
- Check specifications completely
- Identify scope gaps
- Document assumptions
Risk Assessment:
- Evaluate design completeness
- Assess unknown conditions
- Consider productivity factors
- Review schedule requirements
Contingency Approach:
- Include appropriate contingency
- Higher for less-defined projects
- Lower for repeat/familiar work
- Document contingency allocation
Unit Price Strategy
Accurate Unit Costs:
- Know your true unit costs
- Track historical productivity
- Update for current conditions
- Consider scale effects
Quantity Analysis:
- Evaluate owner's estimates
- Research actual conditions
- Consider likely variances
- Factor into pricing strategy
Balance Considerations:
- Avoid extreme unbalancing
- Consider owner expectations
- Maintain defensible pricing
- Document pricing rationale
Contract Administration Differences
Lump Sum Administration
Progress Payments:
- Based on schedule of values
- Percentage complete by item
- Less quantity verification
- Monthly payment applications
Change Orders:
- Based on actual added/deleted cost
- May use unit prices for changes
- Scope definition critical
- Document basis for changes
Unit Price Administration
Progress Payments:
- Based on quantities installed
- Requires measurement/verification
- Field documentation critical
- May require surveying
Quantity Adjustments:
- Overruns paid at unit price
- Underruns reduce payment
- Major variations may warrant adjustment
- Track compared to bid quantities
Hybrid Contract Approaches
Best of Both Worlds
Combine contract types strategically:
Lump Sum Items:
- Well-defined building work
- Fixed equipment installations
- Defined finish packages
Unit Price Items:
- Earthwork quantities
- Underground utilities
- Concrete flatwork
- Variable scope items
Common Applications
Site Development:
- Unit prices for site grading
- Lump sum for buildings
- Unit prices for utilities
Infrastructure Rehabilitation:
- Lump sum for defined repairs
- Unit prices for variable quantities
- Allowances for unknowns
Conclusion
Understanding the differences between unit price and lump sum contracts helps you bid more strategically and manage projects more effectively. Each approach has its place depending on project characteristics and risk tolerance.
For well-defined projects with complete designs, lump sum contracts provide cost certainty for owners and profit potential for efficient contractors. For projects with uncertain quantities, unit price contracts fairly allocate risk and provide flexibility.
When bidding, match your estimating approach to the contract type. For lump sum, invest heavily in accurate takeoffs and risk assessment. For unit price, focus on understanding your true unit costs and likely quantity variations. Your success depends on understanding these differences and adjusting your strategy accordingly.